Super Pragmatics of (linguistic-)pictorial discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Recent advances in the Super Linguistics of pictures have laid Semantic foundation for modelling phenomena narrative sequencing and co-reference pictorial mixed linguistic-pictorial discourses. We take up question how one arrives at pragmatic interpretations such In particular, we offer an analysis of: (i) discourse composition problem : to represent joint meaning a multi-picture discourse, (ii) observed differences prima facie equivalent linguistic vs discourses, (iii) phenomenon co-referencing across pictures. extend Segmented Discourse Representation Theory spell out formal Pragmatics that applies linguistic, while respecting particular ‘genius’ either medium computing their distinctive interpretations.
منابع مشابه
Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites
Everyone agrees that conversations take place in a context. This is not to merely point out that conversations occur at a time and a place, or that there are particular speakers and hearers, though this is all of course true. Conversations take place against a background of mutually recognized facts: facts about the beliefs and presumptions of the participants, facts about the information conve...
متن کاملPragmatics and Discourse in Knowledge Graphs
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are fast becoming the cornerstone of research for storing and retrieving information effectively due to their ability to link heterogeneous data, make inferences, and discover new knowledge without additional human input. Researchers use a plethora of KGs like NELL, DBPedia, YAGO to augment their information extraction activities. However, in such diverse and expressive g...
متن کاملMorphosyntax is Easy , Discourse / Pragmatics is Hard
Turkish is a highly inflected, agglutinative language in which subject NPs are never overtly casemarked, but object NPs often are. Although all six possible word orders are grammatical when objects are overtly casemarked, only SOV and OVS word orders are grammatical when objects lack overt casemarking. In imitation experiments, Batman-Ratyosyan and Stromswold (1999) found that 4and 5-year-old T...
متن کاملLinguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction
Most people working on linguistic meaning or communication assume that semantics and pragmatics are distinct domains, yet there is still little consensus on how the distinction is to be drawn. The position defended in this paper is that the semantics/pragmatics distinction holds between (context-invariant) encoded linguistic meaning and speaker meaning. Two other ‘minimalist’ positions on seman...
متن کاملDiscourse Plans and Linguistic Meaning
There are two different approaches to meaning formalization: one logical, another cognitive. The logical approach, going back to Frege and developed and explicitly applied to natural language semantics by Montague, is characterized by establishing semantics from primitive semantic structures of sentential type. This approach is most consistently represented by type logical grammars (see collect...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistics and Philosophy
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0165-0157', '1573-0549']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09374-x